MOCpages : Share your LEGO® creations
LEGO models my own creation MOCpages toys shop ASF-100 PhantomMilitary
Welcome to the world's greatest LEGO fan community!
Explore cool creations, share your own, and have lots of fun together.  ~  It's all free!
ASF-100 Phantom
Rate it  12345       Add a comment Add a comment   Zoom in  Zoom in
The ASF-100 Phantom is a fifth-generation VTOL multirole combat aircraft. It was a joint-project between the Cerulean Republic and the Conglomerate.
About this creation


























Crew: 2
Length:63 ft.
Wingspan:50 ft.
Height: 18 ft.
Weight(unloaded): 40,000 lbs.
Weight(loaded):64,000 lbs.
Powerplant: 2 Flytron 3000 thrust vectoring turbofan engines
Dry Thrust: 30,000+ lbs.
Thrust with afterburner: 40,000+ lbs.
Max Speed: mach 3+
Super Cruise: mach 2.5
Range:2,000+ miles


Armament

Guns: 1 30 mm gatling gun, 300 rounds
Air-to-Air loadout: 8 ARMMS
Air-to-Ground loadout: 2 ARMMS, 2 GDSBss, 8 SDGBs
Flares: 30 flares

Fighters, Fighter-Bomber Hybrids - Exspensive
Speed: 15
Maneuverability: 15
Rate of Fire: 10
Range (Weapons): 14
Flight Range: 15
Stealth: 18
Altitude Resistance (How high up can it go?): 13




Comments

 I made it 
  January 14, 2014
Quoting Jake Sandvall * snipped to save space *
Some of my vehicles have fictional names, like the AT-60 (armored transporter-60) as they are built for a wargaming group called D&C3. As an American country I obviously can't use Russian names. ;)
  January 13, 2014
Okay, so here are the rest of the comments... AT-60: I thought it was BTR-60. If you were trying to make something based off of that, then it is very detailed and accurate. DUKW: Actually, plain enough that it doesn't have to be used as military. Nice. M106: Pretty cool. RA-24: First, you should know that "RA-24" was a recon version of the A-24 Banshee. On the truck, sweet! AMX-14: Interesting. the oscillating turret is pretty cool. AMX-TC: Nice little thing. I'll give my other opinions in the next comments.
  January 13, 2014
MT-55: Awesome little tank! I like the .30 caliber. Nice touch. AASPM-55: Sweet! Are those cannons or machine guns? HT-10: Pretty basic little tank. I like it. Huey: Amazingly accurate make of it. F-86: Looks fast, even in LEGO form! P-51: Again, amazingly accurate. F.10: Kinda reminds me of an A-10. Nice. CF-105: Looks even better than the real one! B-17: Amazingly accurate, again. B-52: Beautiful. My personal favorite. One problem is, it's HUGE. KC-135: I like it. C-130: There was a guy who made a version of this. Yours is just as good. PT-109: Cool little boat. DD-435, Seattle-Class, and San Fransisco Class: All beautiful boats.
 I like it 
  July 14, 2012
wow you are just amasing with building militiry stuff!
 I like it 
  December 20, 2011
Very nice shape and design!
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  November 10, 2011
you don need to buy it.Just buy the lego creator kit that has this fighter jet and tweake it.That's what I did.
 I made it 
  November 10, 2011
Quoting ryan .... Oh my god that looks amazing. I would love to have one. How much would that cost on Ldd.
I think it was over 100 dollars.
 I made it 
  November 10, 2011
Quoting ryan .... Oh my god that looks amazing. I would love to have one. How much would that cost on Ldd.
I think it was over 100 dollars.
 I made it 
  November 10, 2011
Quoting ryan .... Oh my god that looks amazing. I would love to have one. How much would that cost on Ldd.
I think it was over 100 dollars.
 I like it 
  November 10, 2011
Oh my god that looks amazing. I would love to have one. How much would that cost on Ldd.
 I like it 
  November 8, 2011
Amazing work on this build looks fantastic
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 25, 2011
Hey Matthew as a friend just wanted to let you know that -Caleb- has uploaded an ldd ASF-100 Phantom I didnt "Like" it because why like the same exact thing.
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 25, 2011
Thanks for clearing up that he also own's it to.I thought he was just copying you or somthing.Thanks for clearing it up dont worry I didnt be mean or anything to him.Again thank's for the comment's on my drone feel free to comment on it again if ya like.
 I made it 
  October 25, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert Hey Matthew as a friend just wanted to let you know that -Caleb- has uploaded an ldd ASF-100 Phantom I didnt "Like" it because why like the same exact thing.
Thanks for telling me though. I wouldn't want someone using my creations without permission.
 I made it 
  October 25, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert Hey Matthew as a friend just wanted to let you know that -Caleb- has uploaded an ldd ASF-100 Phantom I didnt "Like" it because why like the same exact thing.
Yah, I know he did. Infact, I thought he would have done it sooner. We built that fighter together, so he gets it as well. He contributed his older fighter as a start to work with, and did a little bit of work on the new one so he should get just as much credit as me.
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 19, 2011
it is proven.it's less stealthy but better suited for dogfight's. Let's stop arguing about plane's we seem to forget this is just for a fighter comp. Btw this will give you either 20 or 21 likes somthing my plane wont get lol.
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 19, 2011
The T-50 is proven to be way more agile and better aerodynamic's and also has less drag.I think we should stop arguing about stupid stuff. not worth the fight Btw this "Like" will give this 20 likes somthing my Haven Fighter wont get lol.
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 19, 2011
Once John upload's his F/A-17E firestorm and if I can get other people to post a jet the comp will finally start
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 19, 2011
an unmanned T-50 would be better.Better agility and aerodynamic's.
 I made it 
  October 19, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert it is proven.it's less stealthy but better suited for dogfight's. Let's stop arguing about plane's we seem to forget this is just for a fighter comp. Btw this will give you either 20 or 21 likes somthing my plane wont get lol.
agreed
 I made it 
  October 19, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert an unmanned T-50 would be better. Better agility and aerodynamic's.
Thats not proven, and my fighter is not an unmanned f-22. It just resembles one.
 I made it 
  October 19, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert an unmanned T-50 would be better. Better agility and aerodynamic's.
Thats not proven, and my fighter is not an unmanned f-22. It just resembles one.
 I made it 
  October 19, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert the grey fighter at the bottom look's like a unmanned F-22
That's because that is what it is, except faster.
 I made it 
  October 19, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert the grey fighter at the bottom look's like a unmanned F-22
That's because that is what it is, except faster.
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 18, 2011
the grey fighter at the bottom look's like a unmanned F-22 and yes that look's faster
 I made it 
  October 18, 2011
Quoting Richie "Richie2571" Collins That doesn't look like it can do mach 3+. For Mach 3+ capability, this thing should have more delta-ish wings. A higher degree of backward sweep on the leading edge, at any rate. For future "mach 3+" Designs you should try to minimise the leading edge surface area, and blend the shape as much as possible. besides that, i like it
Doea the design of the large grey fighter to the left of the Phantom in the very-bottom picture look faster?
 I made it 
  October 18, 2011
Quoting Richie "Richie2571" Collins That doesn't look like it can do mach 3+. For Mach 3+ capability, this thing should have more delta-ish wings. A higher degree of backward sweep on the leading edge, at any rate. For future "mach 3+" Designs you should try to minimise the leading edge surface area, and blend the shape as much as possible. besides that, i like it
Doea the design of the large grey fighter to the left of the Phantom in the very-bottom picture look faster?
 I like it 
  October 18, 2011
That doesn't look like it can do mach 3+. For Mach 3+ capability, this thing should have more delta-ish wings. A higher degree of backward sweep on the leading edge, at any rate. For future "mach 3+" Designs you should try to minimise the leading edge surface area, and blend the shape as much as possible. besides that, i like it
 I like it 
  October 18, 2011
A bit of F-22, a bit of T-50, a bit of J-20... just perfect!!
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 17, 2011
well thats why you dont use this for a first strike.We prefer to use our F/A-77 because of it's radar jamming pod's that make stealth usless against us
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 17, 2011
my radar jammer's jam ANY radar.Plane radar,ground radar SAM radar sit's.My plane doesnt need stealth because its nose radar has a low frequency switch that enable's low freq radar to pick up a stealth fighter.It's possible in real life also.
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 17, 2011
My plane's have special pod's that are more powerful and jam any kind of enemy radar.But yet the plane is still agile enough to shoot down F-22s,F-35s,SU-50s etc.The F/A-77 is also coated with RAM that make's enemy radar harder to track it.And it has some angles on it.Its really a semi-stealth fighter that can kill a stealth fighter without fail. Plane's like today like the EA-18G Growler are used to jam enemy radar's so our plane's can go in undetected.they also carry AMRAAMs for self defence and HARM missiles to destroy radar's.My F/A-77 carries an ECMP that jam's enemy aircraft radar's making them usless to track or detect anything.
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 17, 2011
lets also continue this chat on my F/A-77 so you can get a feel of what the plane look's like and does.Note im still working on new missile's for it.
Matthew McCall
Josh Guilbert
  October 17, 2011
ok thanks and "Like" it if you could,I noticed something weird that evertyime I click like on this it add's a like to your ASF-100 guess they didnt fix that or somthing idk. but yeah ill be there
 I made it 
  October 17, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert ok thanks and "Like" it if you could,I noticed something weird that evertyime I click like on this it add's a like to your ASF-100 guess they didnt fix that or somthing idk. but yeah ill be there
I am about to post my first comment there.
 I made it 
  October 17, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert My plane's have special pod's that are more powerful and jam any kind of enemy radar.But yet the plane is still agile enough to shoot down F-22s,F-35s,SU-50s etc.The F/A-77 is also coated with RAM that make's enemy radar harder to track it.And it has some angles on it.Its really a semi-stealth fighter that can kill a stealth fighter without fail. Plane's like today like the EA-18G Growler are used to jam enemy radar's so our plane's can go in undetected.they also carry AMRAAMs for self defence and HARM missiles to destroy radar's.My F/A-77 carries an ECMP that jam's enemy aircraft radar's making them usless to track or detect anything.
Moved to Haven Fighter.
 I made it 
  October 17, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert lets also continue this chat on my F/A-77 so you can get a feel of what the plane look's like and does.Note im still working on new missile's for it.
Allright, we can continue it there.
 I made it 
  October 17, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert lets also continue this chat on my F/A-77 so you can get a feel of what the plane look's like and does.Note im still working on new missile's for it.
Allright, we can continue it there.
 I made it 
  October 17, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert my radar jammer's jam ANY radar.Plane radar,ground radar SAM radar sit's.My plane doesnt need stealth because its nose radar has a low frequency switch that enable's low freq radar to pick up a stealth fighter.It's possible in real life also.
Allmost every single fighter nowadays has eletronic counter measures, yet they can still be seen and shot down by stealth fighters. Stealth fighters can also have electronic warfare packages. Stealth fighters still have an advantage, because while low freq radar can detect stealth fighters, it is still difficult at best to get missile lock.
 I made it 
  October 17, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert well thats why you dont use this for a first strike.We prefer to use our F/A-77 because of it's radar jamming pod's that make stealth usless against us
How does a radar jamming pod make stealth fighters useless? Your F/A-77 is not stealth, and it's not like my phantoms don't have raddar jammers.
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 16, 2011
I hope your gonna post this in our club cant wait to see it perform and see its price tag to lol
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 16, 2011
AMRAAMs are air-to-air only not air-to-ground but good job
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 16, 2011
Wouldnt it want a short range missile for close range? the gun isnt good unless there very close.
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 16, 2011
F-22s havent seen any combat dude lol.There AIM-120C AMRAAMs are AIR-TO-AIR only they cannot be used for air-to-ground.There trying to make the F-22 a multirole plane wich is stupid because the plane isnt suited to drop bombs.The F-22 can carry 2 internal JDAM's and countless external munitions
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 16, 2011
now I noticed it's range is 1,800mi that's pretty bad for a fighter.Like the T-50 PAK FA has a 3,000 somthing range just tossing it out there.It's still a great modifie
Matthew McCall
 I like it 
Josh Guilbert
  October 16, 2011
2,000 is pretty reasonable.External drop tanks up the range more to.
 I made it 
  October 16, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert 2,000 is pretty reasonable.External drop tanks up the range more to.
External fuel tanks ruin stealth, so we prefer not to use them.
 I made it 
  October 16, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert now I noticed it's range is 1,800mi that's pretty bad for a fighter.Like the T-50 PAK FA has a 3,000 somthing range just tossing it out there.It's still a great modifie
Oh, your right. I just modified the stats form Caleb's ASF-30. I will up it a litle.
 I made it 
  October 16, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert now I noticed it's range is 1,800mi that's pretty bad for a fighter.Like the T-50 PAK FA has a 3,000 somthing range just tossing it out there.It's still a great modifie
Oh, your right. I just modified the stats form Caleb's ASF-30. I will up it a litle.
 I made it 
  October 16, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert now I noticed it's range is 1,800mi that's pretty bad for a fighter.Like the T-50 PAK FA has a 3,000 somthing range just tossing it out there.It's still a great modifie
Oh, your right. I just modified the stats form Caleb's ASF-30. I will up it a litle.
 I made it 
  October 16, 2011
Quoting Anders T Nice plane. I actually like the comparative shots the most, You should re-upload your old HTML pics, the other planes look great.
Thats a good idea, thanks.
 I like it 
  October 16, 2011
Nice plane. I actually like the comparative shots the most, You should re-upload your old HTML pics, the other planes look great.
 I made it 
  October 16, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert Wouldnt it want a short range missile for close range? the gun isnt good unless there very close.
I checked, and F-22s use medium-ranged missiles for ground-attack missions.
 I like it 
  October 16, 2011
Nice. It look great.
 I made it 
  October 16, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert AMRAAMs are air-to-air only not air-to-ground but good job
It carries two AMRAAMs for defence.
 I made it 
  October 16, 2011
Quoting Josh Guilbert I hope your gonna post this in our club cant wait to see it perform and see its price tag to lol
I will put it there when I get the stats done.
 I like it 
  October 16, 2011
Very nice! This thing looks very smooth and fast!
 
By Matthew McCall
Add to my favorite builders

31
people like this. See who.

1,443 visitors
57 comments
Added October 16, 2011
 


LEGO models my own creation MOCpages toys shop ASF-100 PhantomMilitary


You Your home page | LEGO creations | Favorite builders
Activity Activity | Comments | Creations
Explore Explore | Recent | Groups
MOCpages is an unofficial, fan-created website. LEGO® and the brick configuration are property of The LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, own, or endorse this site.
©2002-2014 Sean Kenney Design Inc | Privacy policy | Terms of use