MOCpages : Share your LEGO® creations
LEGO models my own creation MOCpages toys shop MOCpages help
Welcome to the world's greatest LEGO fan community!
Explore cool creations, share your own, and have lots of fun together.  ~  It's all free!
Conversation »
uploader doubling images.
Join to comment
well i dont know if it its just me but i couldent help but notice yesterday that when i was uploading my mercedes ambulance stuff the images kept doubling,after i confirmed the images i wanted and just before the html goes in thats when its starts.so the way i saw it as i kept retrying it over and over yata yata it seems like it was going image to image(the doubling)and the reason why im bringing it up its becuse its time comsuming and downright annoying trying to get it right.so i had to upload 2 at a time then what i allways do.so is it just me or is it just a phase? becuse its happend before and at first i havent seen the problem in few weeks but just yesterday it came back.so any simalar views? (and by the way i have a few qestions to ask mocpages moderation if they have time.)
Permalink
| October 16, 2013, 8:08 pm
 Group moderator 
Quoting adam thelegofan rutland
well i dont know if it its just me but i couldent help but notice yesterday that when i was uploading my mercedes ambulance stuff the images kept doubling,after i confirmed the images i wanted and just before the html goes in thats when its starts.so the way i saw it as i kept retrying it over and over yata yata it seems like it was going image to image(the doubling)and the reason why im bringing it up its becuse its time comsuming and downright annoying trying to get it right.so i had to upload 2 at a time then what i allways do.so is it just me or is it just a phase? becuse its happend before and at first i havent seen the problem in few weeks but just yesterday it came back.so any simalar views? (and by the way i have a few qestions to ask mocpages moderation if they have time.)


Just out of curiosity are you getting any delays before the uploader tells you it is finished? And when you get those delays, are you pressing ok again just to be sure?

Because if you are then you are sending two requests to upload the images without realising it.
Permalink
| October 17, 2013, 4:30 am
Quoting andros tempest

Just out of curiosity are you getting any delays before the uploader tells you it is finished? And when you get those delays, are you pressing ok again just to be sure?

Because if you are then you are sending two requests to upload the images without realising it.
well sometimes i click the same image by mistake,after i picked the images i clicked the upload button.i wait when its finished i oversee the photos to see if its got it right,but if it did double up the 2 images inside i did not let it go through i cut it off then tryed it again same thing,one time i did let it go through only to the confirm page to see how pics would look like on one of our creation pages.so i clicked go back and that's when i did two at a time it seems to go away when 2 pics are uploaded at a time.dealays im not really sure before it did miss a few images that i had to put back in.
Permalink
| October 17, 2013, 1:41 pm
 Group admin 
Quoting adam thelegofan rutland
(and by the way i have a few qestions to ask mocpages moderation if they have time.)


Since Andros is helping you with your main question... What other questions do you have?
Permalink
| October 17, 2013, 4:40 pm
Quoting Chris Phipson

Since Andros is helping you with your main question... What other questions do you have?

not to start anything but im glad your here i need your opinion on something http://www.mocpages.com/group.php/23130 groups centered on topics like this is it under toning slander to you? and also i need know your opinion on this page http://www.mocpages.com/home.php/105804 its another inpersonation.if you need more info id be happy to talk about it.(thats something on the side i wanted to bring up)anyway if i something investigated would you need to see my evidence?(esential or not esential?)
Permalink
| October 17, 2013, 7:15 pm
 Group admin 
It's been taken care of.

~Chris.
Permalink
| October 21, 2013, 6:08 am
 Group moderator 
Quoting adam thelegofan rutland
Quoting andros tempest

Just out of curiosity are you getting any delays before the uploader tells you it is finished? And when you get those delays, are you pressing ok again just to be sure?

Because if you are then you are sending two requests to upload the images without realising it.
well sometimes i click the same image by mistake,after i picked the images i clicked the upload button.i wait when its finished i oversee the photos to see if its got it right,but if it did double up the 2 images inside i did not let it go through i cut it off then tryed it again same thing,one time i did let it go through only to the confirm page to see how pics would look like on one of our creation pages.so i clicked go back and that's when i did two at a time it seems to go away when 2 pics are uploaded at a time.dealays im not really sure before it did miss a few images that i had to put back in.


I find it easiest to upload all the photos in small batches, save after each batch and then go back in and upload the next batch, until I've got the shell version of my page without any writing.

save that, then go back in and edit to add text, move stuff around and delete anything that I don't need.

IF you do this, there is no need to re-request the same images be uploaded again. I've done this myself in error. It isn't a fault of the uploader it's a fault of me just grabbing a whole bunch of file names without checking which ones I have already.

It might also be an idea to give the photos/scans names that mean something, so it's easier to track which you have uploaded and which you haven't.

As the issue seems to be confined to you Adam, I'm tempted to say it's probably user error rather than a legitimate glitch. If it occurs again could you describe the whole process you followed so I can pin point where the error may be occurring.
Permalink
| October 21, 2013, 6:46 am
 Group moderator 
Quoting Chris Phipson
It's been taken care of.

~Chris.


I think Adam was also hoping for feedback on the alleged fake account that he claims was made to impersonate him.

his true account http://www.mocpages.com/home.php/99605
Copy http://www.mocpages.com/home.php/105804

I'm not sure I'm able to comment on why I believe the account was created. Perhaps if Sean or someone else, could view the IP address of the "bogus" account it might flag up who the culprits are. I don't have a high enough level of access to the servers to check that myself.


Permalink
| October 21, 2013, 11:03 am
 Group admin 
Quoting andros tempest

I think Adam was also hoping for feedback on the alleged fake account that he claims was made to impersonate him.

his true account http://www.mocpages.com/home.php/99605
Copy http://www.mocpages.com/home.php/105804

I'm not sure I'm able to comment on why I believe the account was created. Perhaps if Sean or someone else, could view the IP address of the "bogus" account it might flag up who the culprits are. I don't have a high enough level of access to the servers to check that myself.



I'll send over these two pages to Sean and he can have a look.

Permalink
| October 21, 2013, 1:23 pm
well i thank you all for helping out i believe i have a suspect for the fake page about me if you have time i would be happy to discuss it with you.but most inportantly i would direct my attenion to this guy---->http://www.mocpages.com/home.php/94325 after all he is the one who showed me the page in the first place at the brush fire.
Permalink
| October 23, 2013, 7:24 pm
Quoting andros tempest

I find it easiest to upload all the photos in small batches, save after each batch and then go back in and upload the next batch, until I've got the shell version of my page without any writing.

save that, then go back in and edit to add text, move stuff around and delete anything that I don't need.

IF you do this, there is no need to re-request the same images be uploaded again. I've done this myself in error. It isn't a fault of the uploader it's a fault of me just grabbing a whole bunch of file names without checking which ones I have already.

It might also be an idea to give the photos/scans names that mean something, so it's easier to track which you have uploaded and which you haven't.

As the issue seems to be confined to you Adam, I'm tempted to say it's probably user error rather than a legitimate glitch. If it occurs again could you describe the whole process you followed so I can pin point where the error may be occurring.
thank you!ill use that info well, by the way i uploaded school bus 7 and the ford super duty today didint see any doubling issues on the bus but the truck did have the doubling issue.so in case missed anything in the last piece i useualy upload selected images all at once.
Permalink
| October 23, 2013, 7:29 pm
i need moderations help a certain somebody(1x^) is trying to start another argument.http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/369403
Permalink
| November 6, 2013, 7:04 pm
he's at it again.
Permalink
| November 9, 2013, 1:52 am
Quoting adam thelegofan rutland
he's at it again.

So don't feed the troll. Leave him alone and he'll go away. Don't respond to any comment anywhere from him, don't even talk about him. His friends will read it and they will forwarc it on to him. Don't do anything with him.
Permalink
| November 9, 2013, 7:06 pm
Quoting MCLegoboy !
So don't feed the troll. Leave him alone and he'll go away. Don't respond to any comment anywhere from him, don't even talk about him. His friends will read it and they will forwarc it on to him. Don't do anything with him.

i wont forget that advice.
Permalink
| November 10, 2013, 12:59 am
Quoting Chris Phipson
It's been taken care of.

~Chris.

chris if you have time id like to ask a qestion.
Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 3:14 pm
Quoting adam thelegofan rutland
chris if you have time id like to ask a qestion.

This is about the status updates isn't it. My advice, give it up. It's easier to move on than keep stirring this up.....
Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 3:46 pm
Quoting Brickcity 101
This is about the status updates isn't it. My advice, give it up. It's easier to move on than keep stirring this up.....

its not me who wont give it up. its them who wont give it up.anyway to answer both of your qestions after chris told you know who to stop seeing my page i just wanted to let him know that guy did not heede his warning.
Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 3:50 pm
Quoting Jonah L.
ID is continuing this on EB, not MOCpages! MOCpages moderators have no say in what goes on in Emergency Bricks. Everything had settled down until you posted the link that no one can do anything about. Why is this still even going on.

To all of the MOCpages moderators. If it's possible, I'd like to see this entire ordeal on MOCpages brought to an end. This now is only able to be fixed through the Emergency Bricks website by OUR Emergency Bricks admins taking action on OUR end of this situation. I'm not meaning to offend anyone by this post, I'm clearly stating my opinion on this matter.

i agree i want this to come to and end permantly.and shame on dakota for not doing anything about it.and one last thing before i go, 1x is complitely the enabler becuse chris made a warning to x and he is not doing his part by letting it go.that's one of the reasons why im here.
Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 4:02 pm
Quoting Jonah L.
I'm having trouble following you here.. What does taking an LDD creation have to do with inviting us to groups? I personally receive no invitations, and highly doubt any other member involved in this receives invites, either. I'm not trying to start a flame war here by asking multiple questions, but I would like a definition for this.

um when did andros comment come in? i dont see it.but from what i read i agree with it.
Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 4:17 pm
Backing out of this situation. Decided it isn't my business to discuss it.
Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 4:18 pm
i thought so.probaly got deleted by mistake maybe.
Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 4:20 pm
Invalid activity INSERT INSERT DELAYED INTO activity (created, to_personid, from_personid, from_name, reviewid, groupid, topicid, regarding_personid, regarding_name, action) VALUES (NOW(), , , 'adam thelegofan rutland', 1280005, 2600, 92255, , 'adam thelegofan rutland', 'replied'); and what's this?
Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 4:20 pm
Quoting adam thelegofan rutland
Invalid activity INSERT INSERT DELAYED INTO activity (created, to_personid, from_personid, from_name, reviewid, groupid, topicid, regarding_personid, regarding_name, action) VALUES (NOW(), , , 'adam thelegofan rutland', 1280005, 2600, 92255, , 'adam thelegofan rutland', 'replied'); and what's this?

That would be a server issue. Happens all the time. No need to worry.
Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 4:21 pm
Quoting Brickcity 101
That would be a server issue. Happens all the time. No need to worry.
oh becuse ive been seeing it a lot lately.

Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 4:22 pm
Okay, this is my last comment on this topic. I don't want to step on anyone's toes. Sorry to the mods if I aggravated you guys. I'm not getting involved in this anymore. Adam, I hope you can move on and stop beating what is pretty much a dead horse. Just drop out of the LFC and do whatever you want. But always give credit. That's all I've got. I'll let someone else handle this.
Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 4:27 pm
Quoting Brickcity 101
Okay, this is my last comment on this topic. I don't want to step on anyone's toes. Sorry to the mods if I aggravated you guys. I'm not getting involved in this anymore. Adam, I hope you can move on and stop beating what is pretty much a dead horse. Just drop out of the LFC and do whatever you want. But always give credit. That's all I've got. I'll let someone else handle this.

I agree with Brickcity here. We both agreed in a chat room we are in that we are no longer a part of said discussion(s) on this Adam subject. Thanks to the mods for doing what they have or will do on bringing this to a close. Sorry for any trouble we have caused by posting here. Thanks
Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 4:29 pm
 Group moderator 
I deleted my previous comment because I realised I was making assumptions and preferred not to make things more complicated.

My advice would be to leave this conversation, stop quoting each other about something that WOULD blow over if you just ignored it.


Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 4:45 pm
Quoting andros tempest
I deleted my previous comment because I realised I was making assumptions and preferred not to make things more complicated.

My advice would be to leave this conversation, stop quoting each other about something that WOULD blow over if you just ignored it.

allright ill do that.

Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 4:47 pm
Quoting andros tempest
I deleted my previous comment because I realised I was making assumptions and preferred not to make things more complicated.

My advice would be to leave this conversation, stop quoting each other about something that WOULD blow over if you just ignored it.

http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/376111#comments at it again! mods intervention
is needed.im just debating weather i should say something.just trying to do the right thing and keep my cool you know.
Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 9:14 pm
Quoting adam thelegofan rutland
at it again! mods intervention
is needed.im just debating weather i should say something.just trying to do the right thing and keep my cool you know.

Haven't you been instructed to drop this?

Now, I haven't really been paying attention to this waffle, but your behaviour is something I feel a need to address.

The site staff are NOT hammers.

You may not use them to beat dissenters into submission.

It's plain enough there's some sort of deep seated grievance involved, but you need to learn that 'hurting someone's FEHEHEHELIIINGS' is not against the rules.
Being rude about it is, and some of this stuff seems a bit borderline, but Phipson seems to think you stole other people's designs.

I'm inclined to trust Phipson's judgement.

Calling someone a thief is certainly going to hurt their feeeeliiings, but kiddie? Some people's feelings? NEED to be hurt.

Demanding a moderator club them into being 'nice' to you is not appropriate behaviour, and people like you are why TFOLs are seen as immature drama-magnets.



And another thing: cut out the passive-aggressive waffle.
Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 11:41 pm
Quoting Areetsa C
Haven't you been instructed to drop this?

Now, I haven't really been paying attention to this waffle, but your behaviour is something I feel a need to address.

The site staff are NOT hammers.

You may not use them to beat dissenters into submission.

It's plain enough there's some sort of deep seated grievance involved, but you need to learn that 'hurting someone's FEHEHEHELIIINGS' is not against the rules.
Being rude about it is, and some of this stuff seems a bit borderline, but Phipson seems to think you stole other people's designs.

I'm inclined to trust Phipson's judgement.

Calling someone a thief is certainly going to hurt their feeeeliiings, but kiddie? Some people's feelings? NEED to be hurt.

Demanding a moderator club them into being 'nice' to you is not appropriate behaviour, and people like you are why TFOLs are seen as immature drama-magnets.



And another thing: cut out the passive-aggressive waffle.

i understand what your saying but im just dropping a line and staying out of it.im done with those people.just letting mods know its still going on considering we thought we took care of it allready.im trying to stay out of trouble and mods allready told me to ignore them.and that's what im TRYING to do.
Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 11:46 pm
Quoting adam thelegofan rutland
i understand what your saying but im just dropping a line and staying out of it.im done with those people.just letting mods know its still going on considering we thought we took care of it allready.im trying to stay out of trouble and mods allready told me to ignore them.and that's what im TRYING to do.

Quoting Areetsa C
And another thing: cut out the passive-aggressive waffle.

Permalink
| December 8, 2013, 11:51 pm
Hello All,

I too refuse to take part in discussing this issue any further here on MOCpages.com. It's clear Adam has some immaturity issues he needs to address. For the record Adam, that screenshot was not posted until YOU visited the brushfire incident and digged up a status update posted almost a month ago. Obviously, you don't know when to quit.

Thats all--Thank You.
Permalink
| December 9, 2013, 2:10 am
Quoting 1X ^
Hello All,

I too refuse to take part in discussing this issue any further here on MOCpages.com. It's clear Adam has some immaturity issues he needs to address. For the record Adam, that screenshot was not posted until YOU visited the brushfire incident and digged up a status update posted almost a month ago. Obviously, you don't know when to quit.

Thats all--Thank You.

hello the evidence its right there.and your supposed to ignore my posts right? i believe your the one who wont quit.and knowing how you kept putting update after update about me you should have been over it by now.that'l be all.
Permalink
| December 9, 2013, 2:21 am
Quoting adam thelegofan rutland
hello the evidence its right there.and your supposed to ignore my posts right? i believe your the one who wont quit.and knowing how you kept putting update after update about me you should have been over it by now.that'l be all.


STOP MOANING ADAM.. The mods I'm sure are getting sick of you in that case I'd ban you.
Permalink
| December 9, 2013, 3:20 am
Quoting Areetsa C
Haven't you been instructed to drop this?

Now, I haven't really been paying attention to this waffle, but your behaviour is something I feel a need to address.

The site staff are NOT hammers.

You may not use them to beat dissenters into submission.

It's plain enough there's some sort of deep seated grievance involved, but you need to learn that 'hurting someone's FEHEHEHELIIINGS' is not against the rules.
Being rude about it is, and some of this stuff seems a bit borderline, but Phipson seems to think you stole other people's designs.

I'm inclined to trust Phipson's judgement.

Calling someone a thief is certainly going to hurt their feeeeliiings, but kiddie? Some people's feelings? NEED to be hurt.

Demanding a moderator club them into being 'nice' to you is not appropriate behaviour, and people like you are why TFOLs are seen as immature drama-magnets.

*YOU ARE WASTING YOUR TIME TALKING TO ADAM THE LEGOFAN RUTLAND*

And another thing: cut out the passive-aggressive waffle.


Permalink
| December 9, 2013, 3:22 am
Adam your reaction is really disrespectful. You show no respect to everyone here. STOP this moaning now, hold on and think about what your'e doing before you do it. Instead of moaning, you should apologize to those, whose files/models you used without giving credit. This is not fairplay and you should know that. A good advice from me: Delete the stuff which is not your own, apologize deep from your heart, STOP discussing and restart with your own creations. Or leave... I don't care. End of story...
Permalink
| December 9, 2013, 10:48 am
Quoting Sven Jagdmann
Adam your reaction is really disrespectful. You show no respect to everyone here. STOP this moaning now, hold on and think about what your'e doing before you do it. Instead of moaning, you should apologize to those, whose files/models you used without giving credit. This is not fairplay and you should know that. A good advice from me: Delete the stuff which is not your own, apologize deep from your heart, STOP discussing and restart with your own creations. Or leave... I don't care. End of story...





Well said Sven personally I have had enough of Adam the legofan rutland. I want the moderators to ban him from mocpages I've seen everything he has said and done, I've tried giving him advice and others have.
He has disregarded what the moderators have said already he is insighting a hate campaign against a member.

I call for action, action now!.

Permalink
| December 10, 2013, 6:53 am
Quoting FR NI

The impression I got from Phipson's comment is that ALL of you were supposed to drop it.

And what I said about not using site staff as hammers on people you don't like applies to more than just Rutland.
Permalink
| December 10, 2013, 6:56 am
 Group moderator 
Areetsa is correct. The instruction was for EVERYONE to just BACK OFF.

As far as I'm concerned, I'm asking for anyone who will not just let this matter DROP to be removed from the MOCHelp group.

Am I clear on this.
Permalink
| December 10, 2013, 8:11 am
Quoting andros tempest
Areetsa is correct. The instruction was for EVERYONE to just BACK OFF.

As far as I'm concerned, I'm asking for anyone who will not just let this matter DROP to be removed from the MOCHelp group.

Am I clear on this.



That's ok I'll just leave myself.

Permalink
| December 10, 2013, 9:48 am
Other topics
Questionable Home Page Updated Sunday
Safe Browsing Updated Sunday
I can't add comments! Updated Thursday
student teen kid toy play lego child video game hobby blocks construction toy legos fun games



LEGO models my own creation MOCpages toys shop MOCpages help


You Your home page | LEGO creations | Favorite builders
Activity Activity | Comments | Creations
Explore Explore | Recent | Groups
MOCpages is an unofficial, fan-created website. LEGO® and the brick configuration are property of The LEGO Group, which does not sponsor, own, or endorse this site.
©2002-2014 Sean Kenney Design Inc | Privacy policy | Terms of use