|
|
I'm thinking it's the same guy, the homepages are nearly identical. Permalink | April 7, 2012, 2:45 pm |
|
|
I second this motion. And yes. The homepages are 99.9% the same. Permalink | April 7, 2012, 3:33 pm |
|
|
It would be great if these comments/creations could be deleted. My creation has been on top of most discussed all week and I was hoping it was going to make it back on the homepage. Oh well! :( Permalink | April 7, 2012, 3:47 pm |
|
|
BAN HIM BAN HIM BAN HIM! hes been spamming all ovah the place BAN HIM BAN HIM BAN HIM! Permalink | April 7, 2012, 5:00 pm |
|
|
i totally agree he got himself 644 likes!! seriously thats not fair to the rest of us..... Permalink | April 7, 2012, 11:23 pm |
|
|
If only we could thumb down posts like this... Permalink | April 8, 2012, 1:37 am |
|
|
Also if you look at the accounts they both have "Clift" in them. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 1:40 am |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
sorry but I'm just rolling around laughing here. The likes counter is back for 2 weeks and already we have this kind of stuff going on.
Totally agree with everyone above, he's making a joke of the rules - ban and delete. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 4:33 am |
|
|
Quoting Timmy Sterkel (currently on spring break)
i totally agree he got himself 644 likes!! seriously thats not fair to the rest of us.....
His likes counter showed 644 likes. He dosen't actually have that many likes. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 7:13 am |
|
|
Yeh he spammed my mocs! But don't ban him, just delete his mocs and make him re-post them. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 7:27 am |
|
|
Quoting The Essence Of Randomness .
Yeh he spammed my mocs! But don't ban him, just delete his mocs and make him re-post them.
no.....just ban him...i bet he doesnt care about his mocs...they only have 1-2 likes on them Permalink | April 8, 2012, 9:07 am |
|
|
Quoting Nate B.
no.....just ban him...i bet he doesnt care about his mocs...they only have 1-2 likes on them
Ban 'The Second Mark Kelso' One, but leave the other. And yes they are the same perosn. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 9:58 am |
|
|
Quoting The Essence Of Randomness .
Ban 'The Second Mark Kelso' One, but leave the other. And yes they are the same perosn.
Oh i thought they were different people since
they are different ages..... i thought they were brothers Permalink | April 8, 2012, 10:06 am |
|
|
Ban both of them, they're the same person. And using one account to spam the other to get yourself lots of "like"s doesn't seem very fair... although I'm just repeating what everyone else is saying here :) Permalink | April 8, 2012, 10:20 am |
|
|
Quoting Flare .
Ban both of them, they're the same person. And using one account to spam the other to get yourself lots of "like"s doesn't seem very fair... although I'm just repeating what everyone else is saying here :)
Yeh I find it strange becasue 'Captain Clifts' mocs were quite good, and would have got a fair few likes if he hadn't psammed them. But only ban the one that's doing the spamming./ Permalink | April 8, 2012, 10:34 am |
|
|
Quoting The Essence Of Randomness .
Yeh I find it strange becasue 'Captain Clifts' mocs were quite good, and would have got a fair few likes if he hadn't psammed them. But only ban the one that's doing the spamming./
What about his MOCs with hundreds of likes obtained from his spamming? Anyways, he would just create another account to spam his own creations again Permalink | April 8, 2012, 10:39 am |
|
|
I agree with both of the links. but the last one is the worst. his home page is filled with a bunch of stuff before you can get to his creations Permalink | April 8, 2012, 10:41 am |
|
|
Quoting Flare .
What about his MOCs with hundreds of likes obtained from his spamming? Anyways, he would just create another account to spam his own creations again
True. But you could just get him to delete those mocs and re-post them. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 10:43 am |
|
|
Quoting The Essence Of Randomness .
True. But you could just get him to delete those mocs and re-post them.
Dude, I don't think you get it.
Its the same person who made both accounts. He didn't get spammed by mistake. He did it on purpose to get lots of likes for himself. He's not going to just delete those mocs and re-post them, because he's not posting them to show everyone, he's posting them to get lots of likes. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 12:28 pm |
|
|
Quoting The Essence Of Randomness .
True. But you could just get him to delete those mocs and re-post them.
threres no point in that..he can just spam his stuff right after..i say lets have a vote! i vote to ban him! Permalink | April 8, 2012, 12:29 pm |
|
|
Quoting Nate B.
i say lets have a vote! i vote to ban him!
Aye. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 12:35 pm |
|
|
Quoting Chronos Omega
Aye.
Is that a "yes" to banning him? Permalink | April 8, 2012, 12:36 pm |
|
|
Quoting Nate B.
Is that a "yes" to banning him?
Yes, it is. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 12:44 pm |
|
|
Of course, all your votes mean nothing because Chirs, Mark and Sean are the only ones who can ban people. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 12:52 pm |
|
|
Quoting The Essence Of Randomness .
Of course, all your votes mean nothing because Chirs, Mark and Sean are the only ones who can ban people.
Yes.. but we are going to show em why he/she needs to be banned and i will contact one of them soon or later Permalink | April 8, 2012, 1:22 pm |
|
|
Quoting Nate B.
threres no point in that..he can just spam his stuff right after..i say lets have a vote! i vote to ban him!
Voting would be a rather pointless notion, the internet (yes MocPages too) is far from a democracy. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 1:45 pm |
|
|
I say the Mods have to play hardball here. If they don't demonstrate that spammers are not tolerated, we'll be having the same problem for eternity. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 2:53 pm |
|
|
Quoting Eric 'Hawk' Mickle
Voting would be a rather pointless notion, the internet (yes MocPages too) is far from a democracy.
I'd say its more of a semi organized anarchy. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 3:55 pm |
|
|
Quoting The Essence Of Randomness .
Like Flare said, you don't get this. These people are the same. Check their homepages. They're almost the same. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 6:34 pm |
|
|
Quoting /Blue$tar/ +
Like Flare said, you don't get this. These people are the same. Check their homepages. They're almost the same.
Yeh I do get this. I was one of the first to confirm they are the same guy, I'm friends with him on here so I don't want him to get banned, but it's not my decision and it's not yours. Permalink | April 8, 2012, 7:03 pm |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Taken care of. Permalink | April 9, 2012, 10:22 am |
|
|
Quoting Chris Phipson
Taken care of.
did you ban him?! Permalink | April 9, 2012, 10:23 am |
|
|
Quoting Nate B.
did you ban him?!
One of thems still here (the one that's doing the spamming) so I'd guess not. Permalink | April 9, 2012, 10:29 am |
|
|
Quoting Chris Phipson
Taken care of.
Good work sir. Permalink | April 9, 2012, 10:31 am |
|
|
Quoting LukeClarenceVan The Revanchist
Good work sir.
They're both still here but the spammed mocs have been deleted. Permalink | April 9, 2012, 10:32 am |
|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
If it continues please let us know and we'll have to take it to the next level of discipline. Permalink | April 9, 2012, 10:45 am |
|
|
Quoting Chris Phipson
If it continues please let us know and we'll have to take it to the next level of discipline.
And thats a ban.. Permalink | April 9, 2012, 10:47 am |
|
|
Quoting Night Hawk _
Also if you look at the accounts they both have "Clift" in them. You do have a point, they must be the same guy. There's just to much evidence.
Permalink | April 9, 2012, 4:57 pm |
|
|
Quoting Noah the Lego Apprentice
Quoting Night Hawk _
Also if you look at the accounts they both have "Clift" in them. You do have a point, they must be the same guy. There's just to much evidence.
THEY ARE! I've been telling you all that for days but nobody seems to be listening. Permalink | April 9, 2012, 5:16 pm |
|
|
 |
Group moderator |
|
|
definitely NOT spammed. Sorry but the figures look about right for a MOC of that quality. just because someone has more than 600 "i like it" comments doesn't mean they were spammed.
Permalink | April 12, 2012, 11:14 am |
|
|
Yahoo is doing wired things for me too, for example yesterday there was a creation called "space ship" in my inbox by some random guy that i did not fave! and it kept sending it over and over, and my mailbox is full of them. but i fixed it by logging out and then back in to yahoo. Permalink | April 12, 2012, 11:58 am |
|
|
Quoting Timmy Sterkel (currently on spring break)
i totally agree he got himself 644 likes!! seriously thats not fair to the rest of us..... I saw that too! there is another guy who does that too. its on a creation called "blob" Permalink | April 12, 2012, 12:00 pm |
|
|
Quoting andros tempest
definitely NOT spammed. Sorry but the figures look about right for a MOC of that quality. just because someone has more than 600 "i like it" comments doesn't mean they were spammed.
there's a guy on there that posted the same comment a few times. thats why i posted the link Permalink | April 12, 2012, 12:01 pm |
|
|
Quoting Flare .
Ban both of them, they're the same person. And using one account to spam the other to get yourself lots of "like"s doesn't seem very fair... although I'm just repeating what everyone else is saying here :)
I agree. Permalink | April 12, 2012, 12:01 pm |
|
|
LOL... on the end of the spammer's page he has: "DO NOT SPAM ME!!!!!"
lol... Permalink | April 12, 2012, 12:08 pm |
|
|
Quoting Flare .
LOL... on the end of the spammer's page he has: "DO NOT SPAM ME!!!!!"
lol... LOL is right
Permalink | April 12, 2012, 12:12 pm |
|
|
Quoting Flare .
LOL... on the end of the spammer's page he has: "DO NOT SPAM ME!!!!!"
lol...
BIG hint!!! Permalink | April 12, 2012, 12:17 pm |
|
|
On his page it said he started "moccing" or should i say "spamming" in 2009!!??! Permalink | April 12, 2012, 12:19 pm |
|
|
Quoting Flicker The Awesome
On his page it said he started "moccing" or should i say "spamming" in 2009!!??!
yep Permalink | April 12, 2012, 12:30 pm |
|
|
Quoting GrayFox5 (Online)
yep
No, I've known him most of that time, and he only started spamming since he created his second account. Permalink | April 12, 2012, 5:04 pm |
|
|
Quoting The Essence Of Randomness .
No, I've known him most of that time, and he only started spamming since he created his second account.
Oh, ok. when was that? Permalink | April 13, 2012, 9:05 am |
|
|
Quoting Timmy Sterkel (currently on spring break)
i totally agree he got himself 644 likes!! seriously thats not fair to the rest of us.....
Look at this!: http://mocpages.com/moc.php/120237
only 63 but.... Permalink | April 13, 2012, 9:09 am |
|
|
Quoting The Essence Of Randomness .
No, I've known him most of that time, and he only started spamming since he created his second account.
second? aren't we only aloud to have one? Permalink | April 13, 2012, 9:55 am |
|
|
Quoting GrayFox5 (Online)
second? aren't we only aloud to have one? Well, you can make a second account and spam yourself. Without being noticed. However, this guy isn't good at doing because it's (obviously) the same guy.
Permalink | April 13, 2012, 10:14 am |
|
|
Quoting Noah the Lego Apprentice
Quoting GrayFox5 (Online)
second? aren't we only aloud to have one? Well, you can make a second account and spam yourself. Without being noticed. However, this guy isn't good at doing because it's (obviously) the same guy.
I see
Permalink | April 13, 2012, 10:24 am |
|
|
Quoting Noah the Lego Apprentice
Quoting GrayFox5 (Online)
second? aren't we only aloud to have one? Well, you can make a second account and spam yourself. Without being noticed.
No, Sean can track your IP address and if you use the same E-Mail address you will be caught too. Permalink | April 13, 2012, 11:22 am |
|
|
Quoting Legobob ~
No, Sean can track your IP address and if you use the same E-Mail address you will be caught too.
good Permalink | April 13, 2012, 11:23 am |
|
|
Quoting GrayFox5 (Online)
good
It happened to a guy (formerly) known as Shadow Toa, but it was one of his siblings who created a new account with the same IP address as Shadow and Shadow got the blame. He lost his likes and had to create a new account to get them back, and he's now known as Shadow Falcon. (I think. I haven't seen him or his stuff for a while.) Permalink | April 13, 2012, 11:30 am | |
|