|
|
 |
Group admin |
|
|
Okay, now we have been wittled down to 12 members let's begin some serious CC!
However, let me recap you on some of the rules and a new one.
1- In order to create a thread for advice you must have given CC to two other threads.
2- In your thread please say what two threads you gave CC in. This is in order to prove your thread is legitimate.
3- Don't hold back on CC.
4- If you can't take CC, this isn't your kind of group!
So let's get as much threads up as possible!
Permalink | May 5, 2012, 5:22 am |
|
|
Well said. Sombody needs to throw out two MOCs up front though, so everybody else can CC before posting new threads. Oh, and good job on the icon. Attack!
Permalink | May 5, 2012, 7:27 am |
|
|
Yay thanks Gypsy!
Permalink | May 5, 2012, 9:42 am |
|
|
Alrighty then.
Permalink | May 5, 2012, 11:50 am |
|
|
This'll be great!
Permalink | May 6, 2012, 6:43 am |
|
|
What if there is not enough new threads to criticize in (theoretically saying that we already commented in all)?
Do old threads count?
Is writing which threads we commented in enough or shall we link?
Is there a minimum to what we say to legitimize our comment? I suggest that we make it so the maker of the thread verifies commentyness of the commentaries.
Permalink | May 6, 2012, 12:23 pm |
|
|
I recommend we count old threads as valid, otherwise, we would be sort of vapor locked right? Nobody could be the first person to ask for commentary (mathematically). I recommend we just all offer CC on the next two threads and not get caught up in a “catch 22” (AKS the chicken or the egg).
As for comentyness, that word is a crime in the court of grammar.
Permalink | May 6, 2012, 5:18 pm |
|
|
|
Group admin |
|
|
It is a slight predicament. But I propose that we allow everyone to add one free thread. After that we will go with rule #2 of the reforms.
So let's get some threads started.
Permalink | May 7, 2012, 6:01 am |
|
|
sorry have'nt been active for a few days... by tommorrow i'll be CC'n every where! :P
Permalink | May 13, 2012, 10:10 pm |
|
|
Quoting Nate B.
sorry have'nt been active for a few days... by tommorrow i'll be CC'n every where! :P
Mr.B,
Talk is cheap. Don't tell us about all the CC your going to do...SHOW us all the CC.
Attack!
Permalink | May 14, 2012, 9:10 am |
|
|
|
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Nate B.
sorry have'nt been active for a few days... by tommorrow i'll be CC'n every where! :P
Good to see you back and too bad about the Out of Your Comfort Zone Contest. That had promise. Perhaps we could host a contest in this group some time.
Permalink | June 13, 2012, 3:54 am |
|
|
Quoting Space Gypsy .
Good to see you back and too bad about the Out of Your Comfort Zone Contest. That had promise. Perhaps we could host a contest in this group some time.
Yeah, hosting a contest here may be a good idea!
Permalink | June 13, 2012, 12:35 pm |
|
|
Quoting Space Gypsy .
Good to see you back and too bad about the Out of Your Comfort Zone Contest. That had promise. Perhaps we could host a contest in this group some time. A contest! that'd be really great! I'm hoping to lose my builders block, and a contest is JUST what I need!
Permalink | June 13, 2012, 1:02 pm |
|
|
|
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Arnas Scheel
Quoting Space Gypsy .
Good to see you back and too bad about the Out of Your Comfort Zone Contest. That had promise. Perhaps we could host a contest in this group some time. A contest! that'd be really great! I'm hoping to lose my builders block, and a contest is JUST what I need!
But how would I incorporate Constructive Criticism into it?
Perhaps everyone could post a MOC and points are gained based on how good their CC is.
Permalink | June 14, 2012, 3:59 am |
|
|
Quoting Space Gypsy .
But how would I incorporate Constructive Criticism into it?
Perhaps everyone could post a MOC and points are gained based on how good their CC is. Ya, than maybe some points (not many) for grammar and such
Permalink | June 14, 2012, 8:47 am |
|
|
|
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Arnas Scheel
Quoting Space Gypsy .
But how would I incorporate Constructive Criticism into it?
Perhaps everyone could post a MOC and points are gained based on how good their CC is. Ya, than maybe some points (not many) for grammar and such
Excellent. I'll start it once my exams finish. That will be in two weeks.
Permalink | June 15, 2012, 6:28 am |
|
|
Gypsy,
I have a suggestion, I think maybe you should make a few people moderators, like Mr. Rutherford, as he seems to be a very active and contributing person in this group. If you don't know who should be a moderator, maybe you should put up a voting system by making another E-mail and having people not allowed to vote themselves up, not everybody has to contribute, and like the top 2-4 people get to go to "round 2" where people vote them up. and the leading 1-2 people get to become moderators. But if you don't want moderators, that's your choice. I just feel comments would be approved faster.
Permalink | June 25, 2012, 10:05 pm |
|
|
|
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Arnas Scheel
Gypsy,
I have a suggestion, I think maybe you should make a few people moderators, like Mr. Rutherford, as he seems to be a very active and contributing person in this group. If you don't know who should be a moderator, maybe you should put up a voting system by making another E-mail and having people not allowed to vote themselves up, not everybody has to contribute, and like the top 2-4 people get to go to "round 2" where people vote them up. and the leading 1-2 people get to become moderators. But if you don't want moderators, that's your choice. I just feel comments would be approved faster.
Thank you for the suggestion. I have already offered Mr Rurtherford a modship but he respectably declined.
I'm not sure what the point would be in having mods. Would you care to explain?
Permalink | June 26, 2012, 5:52 am |
|
|
Quoting Space Gypsy .
Thank you for the suggestion. I have already offered Mr Rurtherford a modship but he respectably declined.
I'm not sure what the point would be in having mods. Would you care to explain?
Constructive criticism sometimes includes expressions like "bad" (mostly as "not bad") or horrible (as in "horrible lighting") and is caught by the moderating system.
Permalink | June 26, 2012, 6:15 am |
|
|
|
Group admin |
|
|
Quoting Deus Otiosus
Constructive criticism sometimes includes expressions like "bad" (mostly as "not bad") or horrible (as in "horrible lighting") and is caught by the moderating system.
Haha! I just had to moderate that. I guess you anticipated that, though.
Permalink | June 26, 2012, 6:36 am | |
|
