i have this weapon i call a hydro charlie chemical weapon, this weapon has hydrochloric acid inside a shell like a normal bullet or ship to ship gun and once it is fired and non protected or even protected coalition troopers would melt so i was wondering if this is an acceptable weapon
Permalink

Pretty sure COP battle armour is enviromentally sealed against rougher extremes than a puddle of acid.
Permalink

The UNE are now resorting to hydrochloric acid? must be running low on explosives.

FYI a shell that splatters hydrochloric acid over a Coalition trooper in armor would not do anything at all.
Permalink

I feel it might be entertaining to use on a crowd of rioting civilians...
But that's just me.
Permalink

maybe on an officer without head gear it would work on
Permalink

so would a slingshot, or a throwing-axe or knife, or a sharp stick... Let's not even get into 17th century western weaponry...
Permalink

Honestly, even throwing a bottle of hydronium on a soldier would take a while to do any real damage. Acids aren't very battle-practical, though I see where you're coming from.
Permalink

The Coalition still issues swords as frontline weapons.
Permalink

And I see no problem with this whatsoever. Swords don't run out of ammo.
Permalink

We also issues breastplates and other pieces of armor.

Guy on the far right shows it off nicely: http://www.flickr.com/photos/42585324@N03/6605256347/in/photostream
Permalink

maybe a acid filled sword with injection ports
Permalink

http://sirkevinpatrick.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/aliens-meme.jpg?w=510
Permalink

bad idea?
Permalink

It sounds cool at first, but then you realize it's kind of like a James Bond villain's death device... Why bother with the giant saw blade and lasers when you can just shoot them?
Permalink

maybe a combination of battery acid and hydrofluoric acid like the blood of alien dissolving everything it touches
Permalink